Sunday, March 16, 2014

New Phishing Funeral Notice “Clearwater & Largo (Hubbell) Memorial Funeral Home” by Greedy Bastards and Dirtbags!

The Dirtbags are at it again, this time Another Funeral Home!
 
This time the target is "Clearwater & largo Memorial Funeral Home" which isn't their correct name, It's "Hubbell Funeral Home and Crematory", a Largo and Clearwater funeral home,
But that is of no concern to these dirt-bags, again. They just want to infect your computer, and do their dirty deeds.
 
It's been 3 months and a few days since my own mom passed away, and the 1st one of these I got, from another funeral home, Eubanks funeral Home, out of Texas came about a month after her death. It's like they get a sick joy out of taking advantage of people in mourning and/or grieving the loss of a loved one. These are the same types who got great joy out of working in Hitler's concentration camps, or Stalin's gulags. I'm sure there is plenty of room in Hell for all these bastards.
 
The folks using this scam should be thrown into prison and the key thrown away. The problem is, they are from Eastern Europe,
Africa, Russia and other countries that don't give a rat's ass about how low these troglodytes have taken phishing scams.
They are godless and evil, and most likely part of an organized crime operation.
 
DO NOT FOLLOW THE LINK! EVER!
(PS- I deactivated the link, it's just colored for effect!)
 
Hubbell
     Simply Compassionate
   Death notification

We would like to express our deepest sorrow for the untimely death of your beloved
friend and inform you about the life service celebration that will take place at
Hubbell Funeral Home on March 15, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

Please follow this link to get funeral invitation.
Please be there to honor the memory of your friend with her closest people.

Our best wishes and prayers,
Arnav Sears,
Funeral home assistant

99 North Indian Rocks Road | Belleair Bluffs, Florida 33770
Phone 727-584-7671 | Fax 727-584-1073

 
 
Here is the real websites page:
(Notice they mention the scam on the home page!)
 
 
It is so sad we have such low-life's on this planet, but we do, and if there is a hell, they will be the first one's to go. And if there isn't, then we need to stop these dirtbags now!
Share this with all your friends and family if you have been targeted in any way, shape or form.
 
 
Remember, share this with everyone, and now, before they strike again!

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Rep. Josh Miller, A Typical Republican Hypocrite!

Rep. Josh Miller, recipient of significant government assistance, opposes Medicaid expansion in Arkansas and is a typical hypocritical douchebag, I mean Republican!

Rep. Josh Miller

"O wad some Power the giftie gie us To see oursels as ithers see us!"

Miller is of interest because he's a well-known beneficiary of federal government support himself.

Miller, 33, was on an alcohol-fueled drive with a friend about 11 years ago (he can't remember who was driving) when their pickup plunged off a ravine near Choctaw. He was rescued, but suffered a broken neck and was paralyzed. Miller was uninsured. What young, fit man needs health insurance, he thought then. (He had some reason to know better. Not long before, he'd broken his hand in a fight and had to refuse the recommended surgery to fix the injuries properly because he was uninsured.)

Months of hospitalization and rehabilitation followed, including a long stretch in intensive care at St. Vincent Infirmary. There was a $1 million bill. Medicaid paid most of it. Miller was placed on disability and checks began. In time, between Medicaid and Medicare, all his health costs were covered by the federal government. For that reason, he need not be among the 82 Arkansas legislators (61 percent of the body) who enjoy heavily subsidized and comprehensive state employee health insurance.

Health insurance isn't Miller's only government benefit. Another federal Medicaid program for which he qualifies provides daily personal care assistance.

Between the government-paid trauma care, ongoing Medicare and Medicaid coverage, government-provided personal assistant and his own grit, Miller has made a full life. He manages a rental property business (some government-subsidized renters are among his tenants) and serves as a legislator.

My question: How could someone who's received — and continues to receive — significant public assistance oppose health insurance for the working poor? Isn't Miller himself a shining example of how government help can encourage productive citizens?

Miller sees it differently. He said some who qualify for the private option aren't working hard enough. He claims many want health insurance just so they can get prescription drugs to abuse. He draws distinctions with government help for catastrophic occurrences such as he suffered. He falls back, too, on a developing defense from private option holdouts that they prefer an alternative that wouldn't end coverage for the 100,000 people currently signed up, at least until next year. This is disingenuous. He and other opponents have made clear that they want to strip Obamacare from government root and branch. Here's how Miller boiled his opposition down:

"My problem is two things," Miller said. "One, we are giving it to able-bodied folks who can work ... and two, how do we pay for it?"

Lucky for Josh Miller, such thinking didn't prevail when Congress — over Republican opposition — created the programs that sustain him.

A coldly rational person might say a cook in a fast-food restaurant, working long hours at low pay to feed a family, looks more deserving than an uninsured person injured on a drunken joy ride. I would not. No one should be pre-judged on a subjective merit test for health care. We are all God's children — all residents of a country Republicans like to call exceptional, despite its lack of universal health care.

Apart from the core philosophical difference — Miller opposes an expansion of government expenditures; I don't — Miller's position seems to boil down to the belief that some needy people are more deserving than others.

http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/rep-josh-miller-has-received-millions-in-government-assistance-opposes-medicaid-expansion-in-arkansas/Content?oid=3220760

Miller's reasoning is analogous to refusing to build highways because somebody might get drunk and drive off in a ravine. Or some other abuse of the highways.

Rep. Josh Miller is an outstanding example of a Teapubliban hypocrite.
Let's go and ask Rep. Miller if the taxes he has paid or may pay in the future will even come close to paying for all of the government benefits he has and will receive?

His attitude is "I've got mine. Good luck getting yours!" He's just a lower-life scumbag!

From the Desk Of:
William D. Harasym

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Every dog should own a cat (Although no one or nothing ever owns a cat!) & vice versa!

 Every Dog Should Own a Cat!

 

 

cid:0BF6277947AC4447B6D2981123F61CC1@BrendaVAIO

You give up yet?


cid:8104A1F7AB8347F2AC5D2B515B116D62@BrendaVAIO
What, time to get up already? 

cid:C2F587033A074384ABF8E8096D93A4EF@BrendaVAIO
You're kidding -- she said that? 

cid:09F41FA0A5D24D12A2BDEE450A10B2C3@BrendaVAIO
Hmmmm, have you been eating onions? 


 cid:3FDB0DFCDD8A4F11BE565AFC27235A77@BrendaVAIO
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to bite your tail so hard; I was only teasing.

 
cid:5BD4FC89BFA24835B608D766EC06A2C3@BrendaVAIO
So I ran after the ball, then I chased a car, and then I went and got the paper; hey, aren't you listening? 


cid:D3F237CD0A5249E0ACFE0B951551A2CE@BrendaVAIO
What, who, us? We were nowhere near the toilet paper roll. Not us, no way. 


cid:F04F524697B947B1834D415172E438A8@BrendaVAIO
Don't worry about her saying you're fat; I loves ya jest the way you are. 


cid:A6E6DD0C2B344A20ABF0934D4FAC418D@BrendaVAIO
Wait a minute, ain't I supposed to put mypaws over my eyes if you hide? 


cid:EDE8FC105397494387AF8FF1578F276A@BrendaVAIO
Here, I brought him back; next time he goes for a walk, you go get him.

 
cid:829011972A554D0B9A542841B1538804@BrendaVAIO
z-z-z-z…z-z-z-z…z-z-z-z…z-z-z-z…z-z-z…


cid:C22852BAF897427198684ED799723948@BrendaVAIO
Hey Irvin, your ear weighs a ton and I'm stuck.


cid:001C4E131D8A4C74AE179A244F994C46@BrendaVAIO
OK, on three, we all roll over.


cid:A73CE6A9CDDF42FF9724CFCF86E5B36D@BrendaVAIO
He's mine, I caught him, you can't have him, he belongs to me, so there.


cid:62D6708C83814E67BE79588CEAAC0478@BrendaVAIO
Actually Rex, I think it's your time to change the channel.


cid:A1BB74038D3F411CA639FF0A1F354710@BrendaVAIO
OK, I'll be the doughnut this time and you be the doughnut hole.


cid:CFB3FCEC04EB4407975FEAA290B7654A@BrendaVAIO
Don't worry, Larry, they'll have to come through me if they want to take you to the pound.

 

 

I bet you have a smile 😁 on your face now!!!!!!!

 

 

 



Sunday, January 19, 2014

Making Bacon- Right!

Trouble Shoot Your Bacon Problems!


Photo credit: StockFood

What more can we say about bacon? Even vegetarians fall prey to its temptations at times. But for an ingredient so beloved, people muck it up way too often. We're talking limp bacon. Burnt bacon. Soggy bacon. Bacon treated in ways unbecoming of the fine, fine ingredient it is.

Here's how to avoid these classic bacon blunders.

1. Unevenly cooked bacon.

image

Photo credit: Getty

Don't you hate when half a slice of bacon is burnt to a crisp, but the other is floppy and undercooked? Try baking it in the oven instead of frying it to oblivion. This might be the easiest way to make perfect bacon: Just place the slices in a single layer on a baking tray, rev the oven to about 400 degrees Fahrenheit, and bake for about 20 minutes. (You could also try brushing it with some maple syrup at the end. Just sayin'.)

2. Burnt bacon.

image

Some people like their bacon slightly burned, but personally we don't share that sentiment. To avoid burning, remember this credo: slow and steady wins the race. If you're frying your bacon, that means setting your skillet over medium or medium-high heat and no higher. And don't start with cold bacon; let it warm to room temperature, which helps the fat render more quickly.

3. Floppy bacon.

image

Photo credit: Getty

Quit crowding your bacon! Doing that prevents the glorious strips from crisping up, which means gross, floppy, gross bacon. (Did we mention gross?) Seriously, give the slabs some breathing room.

4. Soggy Bacon

image

Photo credit: Flickr/ Chris Yarzab

Bacon is great and all, but that bilious, oily residue that slicks your throat afterward is totally not. Your bacon is soggy because you're not cooking it long enough. Sure, burned bacon is awful. But isn't soggy bacon worse? Give it some time to crisp up!

5. Weirdly thin bacon.

image

Photo credit: Getty

Why settle for sickly little strips of anemic bacon when you can have thick, meaty slabs of salty, beauteous baconitude? Ditch the standard grocery store variety for thick-cut bacon. Your taste buds will thank you.

Follow these rules, and you'll practically be a pro. No need to thank us; we're just doing our jobs. No one should ever have to eat sad bacon. 😉

______________________________________________________



From the Desk of:
Rachel Tepper- Jan 17, 2014

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Official Message from Congressman Cynthia Lummis about Restricting Women's Rights! And her position in the Uterus Police Squad!

Cynthia is doing her Yeoman's work for her fundamentalist right-wing campaign donors.
Although it is easy for millionaires like her to get abortions because of their mistakes while having sex, for everyone else she thinks it is evil, and is basically a hypocrite.
When her daughter had one, it was OK, when she had one, it was OK, but screw everyone else, right Cynthia?

 
January 8, 2014
 
 
William Harasym
200 Smith Street Apt 410
Sheridan, WY 82801-3842
 
Dear William:
 
Thank you for contacting me regarding pro-life issues.  I appreciate this opportunity to respond.
 
I support overturning Roe v. Wade and returning the ultimate decision of abortion legality to the 50 states.  The people of Wyoming, through the state legislature and the constitutional amendment process, should have the right to establish policy on abortion, adoption, the definition of marriage, and other social and family matters in a manner that is consistent with their values, instead of these decisions being made by the Supreme Court. 
 
Most recently, I voted for House passage of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 1797), which passed the House by a vote of 228-196.  Drafted in light of medical evidence that unborn children start experiencing pain at 20 weeks of age or earlier, H.R. 1797 prohibits elective abortions if the post-fertilization age of the unborn child is 20 weeks or more.  The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration.
 
Further, I oppose federal tax dollars being used for abortions – both domestically and abroad.  Federal family planning dollars are currently provided to Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the United States.  While these dollars cannot directly fund an abortion, Planned Parenthood still uses it to free up money for its abortion-providing affiliates. 
 
To end this federal subsidy of abortion, I have cosponsored and voted for House passage of the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act.  Introduced by Rep. Chris Smith as H.R. 3 in the last Congress, the bill would have established a permanent, government-wide, prohibition on federal funding for elective abortions and insurance coverage for elective abortions.  This prohibition would apply specifically to Obama Care.  It would not extend to treatment for complications caused by an abortion or an abortion in cases of rape, incest, or to preserve the life of the mother.
 
H.R. 3 would have also instituted conscience protections for medical providers.  I do not believe that any physician who objects to abortions should be forced to participate in abortions.  All physicians, regardless of source of funding, should have the right to practice medicine pursuant to their personal values regarding life.  I voted for H.R. 3 when it passed the House on May 4, 2011 by a vote of 251-175.  While the U.S. Senate failed to act on this bill before it expired at the end of the 112th Congress, I will continue supporting bills to end the federal abortion subsidy and ensure conscience protections for medical providers.
 
In order to combat gender-based abortion, in the last Congress I cosponsored H.R. 3541, the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act (PRENDA), which was introduced by Rep. Trent Franks of Arizona.  H.R. 3541 would make it a federal offense for doctors to knowingly perform abortions that are sought solely because of the gender of the child.  This is an atrocious practice that is usually pursued to prevent the birth of baby girls in favor of having baby boys.  It is a barbaric form of sex discrimination that is unfortunately occurring in the United States.
 
I voted in favor of H.R. 3541 when it came to vote on May 31, 2012.  H.R. 3541 received a simple majority vote of 246-148.  However, on a motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, it did not meet the required two-thirds majority vote and was not passed by the House.  Despite this setback, I am committed to seeing this legislation through the House of Representatives.
 
I also oppose human embryo destroying research, and have instead chosen to support alternative research, using ethically obtained stem-cells as viable alternatives.  That is why I support research and clinical trials that use adult-stem cells.  These stem-cells have been used to successfully treat patients who suffered from Type 1 Diabetes, Leukemia, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's, and heart diseases.
 
Thank you again for taking the time to write to me.  I value your input.  If you haven't done so already, I would like to encourage you to visit my website at www.lummis.house.gov.  There you can sign up to receive my newsletter, and have access to a wealth of other information.  I won't flood your email box, but I will provide you with updates once in a while about activities in Washington that affect our lives in Wyoming.  I hope you will sign up so that we can stay in close touch, and I look forward to seeing you in Wyoming.
 
 
Sincerely,
Cynthia M. Lummis
Member of Congress

COMMITTEES

Committee on Appropriations

Subcommittee on Agriculture

Subcommittee on the Interior and the Environment

Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education

E-Mail Via Website http://lummis.house.gov
Follow Me on Twitter
Like my Facebook Page

DC Office Location:
113 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202-225-2311


Wednesday, January 15, 2014

House Republicans, all of which are men, is advancing a bill that contains far-reaching restrictions on abortion access. The bill, called the "Rape Audit Bill", H.R. 7!




 

"The Attacks on Women's Health Keep Coming"

It's only January 15th, but Republican legislators and their activist allies are not wasting any time when it comes to the war on women. Just today, both the Supreme Court and Congress considered new restrictions that could limit basic access to abortion.

A panel of House Republicans, all of which are men, is advancing a bill that contains far-reaching restrictions on abortion access. The bill, the so-called Rape Audit, H.R. 7, aims to limit access to abortion by making it much more difficult for women to purchase private insurance that covers abortion (as most private plans currently do) with their own money. (Similar laws were passed by seven states last year.) In addition to increasing taxes on women and small businesses, it would also empower the IRS to conduct audits of rape survivors to ensure they're not merely pretending to be raped. Pro-choice legislators and advocates have been pushing back against this assault, including a group of Democratic congresswomen who sternly told the GOP to "stop wasting taxpayers' time and dollars waging attacks on women's constitutionally protected right to make informed health care decisions about their own bodies."

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), who chairs the Judiciary Committee, claimed the bill is actually a jobs plan because denying women access to abortions will make them have more children, who will in turn help grow the economy. Another leading anti-abortion legislator, Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), blocked a Democratic effort to amend the bill with legislation that cracks down on workplace discrimination against pregnant women by claiming that abortion access has nothing do with pregnant women.

​rapeaudit

CREDIT: DEMOCRATIC LEADER NANCY PELOSI

2. The Supreme Court may rule to eliminate buffer zones at abortion clinics, allowing protesters almost unlimited access to patients and staff. Depending on how the Justices rule in McCullen v. Coakley, a case they heard today, cities and states may no longer be allowed to enact buffer zones around reproductive health care facilities. Since protests outside of clinics often turn violent, abortion providers say that buffer zones are critical for ensuring the safety of their patients and staff. In fact, there have been over 4,700 incidents of clinic violence and 140 clinic blockades since 1995.

Justices Scalia and Alito incredulously claimed that anti-abortion activists who gather outside clinics and harass patients and staff aren't actually even protesting, they merely want to "speak quietly" to patients. It appears likely that Alito, Scalia, Kennedy (who has long opposed buffer zones) will be able to find at least two other justices to strike down the Massachusetts law and perhaps overturn a 2000 ruling that upheld a similar law in Colorado.

It's worth noting that the Supreme Court bans protests on its own plaza.

3. In the past 3 years, states have enacted more abortion restrictions than during the entire previous decade. A new report from the Guttmacher Institute notes that between 2011 and 2013, state legislatures enacted 205 laws that restrict women's reproductive rights. In the decade prior, between 2001 and 2010, states enacted 189 such restrictions. While the campaign against abortion rights rages on nationwide, Guttmacher points out that the multiple, often overlapping restrictions enacted just a few states — North Dakota, Texas, Arkansas, and North Carolina — helped drive the spike.

guttmacher

CREDIT: GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE

4. States with anti-choice governors and state legislatures outweigh states with pro-choice ones. The two charts below illustrate the imbalance. And in a new state-by-state report card released this week by NARAL Pro-Choice America, 25 states receive a failing grade for reproductive rights while America on the whole gets just a 'D' grade.

Choice Positions Of Governors
Choice Positions Of Governors

CREDIT: NARAL

Choice Positions Of State Governments
Choice Positions Of State Governments

CREDIT: NARAL

BOTTOM LINE: Women's health advocates are hopeful that this year will prove to be a turning point in the fight over women's reproductive rights, but so far we're seeing more of the same from their opponents.




Fake Funeral notification by Dirtbags!

I notified the real funeral home about this low-life with the following note-
"Someone is using your funeral homes good name and even colors as a phishing scheme to folks who might have recently lost a loved one. They even copied the copyright/web design by Frazer Consultants data.
This is serious, and just letting you know, and giving you a heads up, because you may be getting calls regarding it.
I did a screenshot of their notice, which I am going to post on my website."

There was a link attached which I didn't add because it can only be trouble. If someone wants it, I'll send it to you, and it starts out with:

From the Desk of:
William D. Harasym

From: Eubank Funeral Home
Sent: ‎Wednesday‎, ‎January‎ ‎15‎, ‎2014 ‎9‎:‎20‎ ‎AM
To: williamharasym@msn.com

Eubank
Funeral Home & Cremation Services

For this unprecedented event, we offer our deepest prayers of condolence and invite to you to be present at the
celebration of your friends life service on Thursday, January 17, 2014 that will take place at Eubank
Funeral Home at 11:00 a.m.

Please find invitation and more detailed information about the farewell ceremony here.

Best wishes and prayers,

Funeral home receptionist,
Arnav Bennett

Copyright 2014 Funeral Home Website Design By: Frazer Consultants LLC


Thursday, January 9, 2014

UPDATE: Frontier Airlines 1st human response from comment sent 5 days ago!

UPDATE regarding the 1st comment I sent to FRONTIER AIRLINES on January 5, 2014 @ 10:36 AM, 5 days ago.
From: Frontier Airlines
Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎January‎ ‎9‎, ‎2014 ‎8‎:‎33‎ ‎AM
To: williamharasym@msn.com


Recently you contacted us for personal assistance.

Your request and our response is displayed below.

Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.

Subject
---------------------------------------------------------------
EarlyReturns travel dates? When are they, once a year?


Discussion Thread
---------------------------------------------------------------
Response Via Email(Erin) - 01/09/2014 08:33 AM
William,

Thank you for your feedback expressing your concerns about EarlyReturns® award seat availability and the difficulties you encountered in trying to book a reservation.

We understand your disappointment in having earned enough miles for an award ticket, yet being unable to successfully book a reservation. A limited number of seats are allotted for award bookings and these seats book quickly, especially on our higher traffic routes. Seats are released at the same time that flights are loaded for sale. There may be instances where our flights are not sold out, but the award seat allotment is full.

Please know, we have the Choice award option. By using more miles, you are able to book an award ticket based on broader availability. Choice awards include two free checked bags. For a complete list of all award types, I have included the following link:
http://www.flyfrontier.com/frequent-flyers/use-your-miles/redeem-miles

In regards to your past dated mileage credit for 01/02/2014. Miles normally post within a week after each flight is flown. Due to our year end process taking place, new 2014 flight credit will show a delay in posting,  we expect you will see the miles in your account after 01/16/14.

We appreciate your patience and hope to serve you again aboard a future Frontier Airlines flight.

Sincerely,

Erin
EarlyReturns Loyalty Agent
Frontier Airlines
*******************
EarlyReturns® Service Center: 866-263-2759
Fax: 720-374-4673
Monday - Friday, 6:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. (Mountain Time)
Saturday - Sunday, 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. (Mountain Time)
________________________________________________________________

Auto-Response - 01/05/2014 10:36 AM
We are currently receiving a high volume of emails. We will respond to your email as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.

Customer By Web Form (William Harasym) - 01/05/2014 10:36 AM
Hey Frontier,

How does one know when they can use their benefits from EarlyReturns? Do you constantly punch in dates, and hope for a date? What good are they when you can't use them when you want to travel? Just another way of the airlines of nickel and dime-ing folks, and screwing them out of their rewards? Why is it only on your dates, whatever they are? and not when the customer wants to travel? It's all BS!

Thanks for your time, and I use to brag about you guys, but now, forget about it, and guess I'll go fly United, American, Delta or Southwest now. You might as well hand out KY Jelly when you promote your Rewards program and Credit Card on board the aircraft. It's all smoke and mirrors, with the ultimate goal of F'in the customer!

Good Night and good luck!

William D. Harasym
USAF Veteran (Disabled)